• Family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery wins $35M verdict against hospital
  • Orthopedic surgeon wins $20M verdict against Johnson & Johnson
  • Minnesota orthopedic group hit with $111M negligence verdict
  • Orthopedic patient's death highlights potential dangers of prior authorization
  • Spine surgeon's video hits 1 million views on TikTok
  • Spine surgeon killed in Oklahoma hospital shooting
  • Spine surgeon owes $17M to paralyzed patient
  • Providence to pay $22.7M to settle unnecessary spine surgery allegations
  • Spine surgeon gets jail time for abusing patient during hospital visit
  • 'They're on really thin ice': Why 1 insurer has drawn spine surgeons' ire
  • Connecticut hospital to appeal $12.5M verdict to family of patient who died after orthopedic surgery
  • Orthopedic surgeon must face suit in patient's death
  • 23 spine device companies to watch in 2022
  • Spine surgeon 1 of 9 physician billionaires on Forbes' 2022 list
  • 4 spine technologies that promised more than they delivered
  • Orthopedic surgeon salary vs. average household income in each state
  • Orthopedic surgeon's health system exit steeped in controversy
  • Terminated orthopedic surgeon contracts with another New York hospital
  • Billionaire spine surgeon buys $23.9M mansion
  • Orthopedic surgeon convicted of battery at hospital
  • Texas spine surgeon defending himself from 'Dr. Death 2.0' allegations
  • UArizona neurosurgery chair dies after motorcycle collision
  • Texas spine surgeon sued by State Farm over 'unnecessary' procedures
  • The spine tech surgeons say will explode in the next 5 years
  • Could Medtronic's spine business be the next medtech spinoff?
  • 41 'rising stars' in orthopedics
  • Orthopedic surgeon indicted in $10M telemedicine fraud scheme
  • Neurosurgeon's startup hits $1.2B valuation
  • Orthopedic surgeon fined for operating on wrong knee
  • Lawsuits build against Aetna's spine surgery coverage
  • Good news, bad news for orthopedic surgeons: 6 observations
  • Walmart's latest partnership pushes retailer into spine care
  • Texas spine surgeon's $11M verdict being appealed
  • 10 power players in orthopedics
  • Rothman Orthopaedics to become national brand, but no 'aspirations to go beyond US'
  • Sports medicine physician fired amid misconduct allegations involving patients
  • Florida hospital patients say they were injured during surgeries. Now a physician faces 350 lawsuits.
  • Top orthopedic hospital in every state: US News
  • Orthopedic surgeon allegedly exaggerated patient visits to defraud insurers
  • Orthopedic surgeon asking for misconduct charges to be dropped
  • The 'overreliance of tech' in spine surgery: 4 insights

    The 'overreliance of tech' in spine surgery: 4 insights

    Alan Condon -  

    As enabling technologies become more widely adopted in spine surgery, there is a concern that the next generation of surgeons may rely too heavily on these innovations to guide them through procedures.

    Four spine surgeons reflected on what the advancement of enabling technologies means for the future of the specialty and why developing a complete understanding of the anatomy will remain critical in spine care.

    Ask Spine Surgeons is a weekly series of questions posed to spine surgeons around the country about clinical, business and policy issues affecting spine care. Becker's invites all spine surgeon and specialist responses.

    Next week's question: Why has the pace of spine surgery migration to ASCs not kept up with that of joint replacement in recent years?

    Please send responses to Alan Condon at acondon@beckershealthcare.com by 5 p.m. CDT Wednesday, June 15.

    Editor's note: Responses were lightly edited for clarity and length.

    Question: Is there a danger of the next generation of spine surgeons becoming too dependent on enabling technologies?

    Wesley Bronson, MD. Mount Sinai Health System (New York City): Enabling technologies, including robotics and navigation platforms, have allowed spine surgeons to enhance the safety and efficiency of spine surgery. As more surgeons incorporate these modalities into their practice, residents and fellows will similarly be exposed to them in their training. It certainly is the case that resident and fellow education has the potential to be compromised by overreliance on these tools.

    If educators focus too much on these technologies without teaching the fundamentals of spine surgery, new spine surgeons entering practice may lack the ability to perform surgery without them. It is the responsibility of both residents and fellows as well those training them to always focus on the basics, even if certain technologies are being used for the case. The thought "what would I do if the navigation wasn't working today?" should always be present.

    Ehsan Jazini, MD. Virginia Spine Institute (Reston): The next generation of spine surgeons must be able to do every aspect of spine surgery without the assistance of enabling technology. The most important skill set for a spine surgeon is being able to deal with option A, B and C. And that means that the surgeon continues to refine and improve upon what option A is by using enabling technologies such as robotics and augmented reality to improve the precision of surgery, do more minimally invasive surgery to help patients recover faster with fewer complication but also always have option B and C in the back pocket. 

    Tibor Boco, MD. NorthShore Neurological Institute (Arlington Heights, Ill.): One of the most important components of training to become a competent spine surgeon is to develop an appreciation of the anatomy and how it extends in the 3D space beyond direct visualization. This skill is essential to accomplish adequate decompression and effective instrumentation. Enabling technologies, such as image guidance and robotics, are great adjuncts in our operative armamentarium but should not replace a thorough understanding of the anatomy.

    Brian Gantwerker, MD. The Craniospinal Center of Los Angeles: A discussion I frequently have with both my reps and those who train residents is there is a genuine concern of the overreliance on tech. Surgeons of a certain vintage who trained on anatomic techniques were slow to adopt them. The next generation seemed more comfortable but were also trained in the backup plan of mapping hardware placement using landmarks and aided by fluoroscopy "just in case." The following generation I hope can still do this. 

    My concern is that instead of verifying and then proceeding, some will just charge ahead, assuming the navigation or technology is spot on. It's more concerning when you think about who exactly is liable when the technology is "off." I hope the next set of surgeons can see its shortcomings and that the need for anatomical knowledge is paramount.

    Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

    Featured Learning Opportunities

    Featured Webinars

    Featured Podcast

    Featured Whitepapers